Anbieter-Warteschlange
OCPI Anbieterqualität und Anomalien
Anbieter nach deterministischer Dringlichkeit sortiert, danach nach schwächstem Qualitätswert und Anomalielast. Entitätsspalten stehen für Locations und EVSEs.
11 ranked providers
Nach Quality Impact Score sortiert (höchste Wirkung zuerst), danach nach fehlgeschlagenen Problemen als Anteil aus fehlgeschlagenen plus bestandenen Prüfungen. Nutzen Sie die Alphabetfilter, um source_uids nach Anfangsbuchstaben anzuzeigen.
| Provider | Priority (QIS) | Impact Score | locations | evses | Geo anomalies | Issues | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EnBW Datex II datex2_enbw |
Priority is based on QIS medium (38.19%). Equal QIS values are ordered by failed issues ratio (0.0%). Base QIS: 34.13% Provider Context: +4.05
|
38.19% | 2405 | 11388 | 0 | 1905 | open source audit |
| EcoMovement Datex II datex2_ecomovement |
Priority is based on QIS medium (34.35%). Equal QIS values are ordered by failed issues ratio (0.0%). Base QIS: 27.31% Provider Context: +7.04
|
34.35% | 14964 | 56242 | 0 | 78952 | open source audit |
| Chargecloud Datex II datex2_chargecloud |
Priority is based on QIS medium (33.92%). Equal QIS values are ordered by failed issues ratio (0.0%). Base QIS: 27.31% Provider Context: +6.61
|
33.92% | 7810 | 24578 | 0 | 51786 | open source audit |
| Taubert Consulting Datex II datex2_taubert |
Priority is based on QIS low (12.08%). Equal QIS values are ordered by failed issues ratio (0.0%). Base QIS: 11.38% Provider Context: +0.70
|
12.08% | 0 | 267 | 0 | 464 | open source audit |
| Midorion Datex II datex2_midorion |
Priority is based on QIS low (9.80%). Equal QIS values are ordered by failed issues ratio (0.0%). Base QIS: 9.10% Provider Context: +0.70
|
9.80% | 0 | 54 | 0 | 81 | open source audit |
| Tesla Datex II datex2_tesla |
Priority is based on QIS low (9.80%). Equal QIS values are ordered by failed issues ratio (0.0%). Base QIS: 9.10% Provider Context: +0.70
|
9.80% | 0 | 3949 | 0 | 4100 | open source audit |